Non-compliances become actions with owners and deadlines. Status updates itself as work lands, the full history is kept forever, and weekly digests keep every site honest.
Finding the problem is the easy part. Making sure somebody fixes it — and being able to prove they did — is where most systems give up.
A finding written as a sentence in a report belongs to everybody, which means it belongs to nobody.
Knowing whether the fire door was actually replaced means asking somebody who was standing there.
At the next audit the same finding appears, and nobody can say what happened to the last one.
Non-compliances become actions with a name and a date on them, and the status follows the work instead of the paperwork.
Straight from the audit answer, with an owner and a deadline attached.
When the fix lands — a photo, a document, a signature — the status moves with it.
What is late surfaces to its owner and the people above them, until it is done.
Every finding gets an owner and a deadline — and escalates when it goes overdue.
When the fix lands — a photo, a document, a signature — the status moves without anyone filing paperwork.
What's open, what's overdue and who's on it — in every stakeholder's inbox.
A non-compliant audit answer creates the action directly, so the thing that needs fixing and the record of fixing it stay connected.
It surfaces to its owner and escalates, rather than sitting quietly at the bottom of a list.
Yes. Every answer, action and edit is versioned, so what changed since last year is a question you can answer.
From audit answer to closed action, with the history to prove it.