Forward-looking climate exposure per site, from the Munich Re Climate Change Edition. Pick a scenario and a horizon — 2030, 2050, 2100 — and see how each location moves against where it stands today.
Most companies can describe their climate exposure in general terms. Very few can name the five sites that get materially worse by 2050.
Not "are we exposed", but "which sites, how much worse, and by when". A paragraph in the sustainability report does not answer that.
Present-day flood and storm scores describe the risk you carry now. They say nothing about the site you are about to spend twenty years depreciating.
A one-off study lands as a PDF, ages immediately, and never reaches the site records where the rest of your risk data lives.
Climate projections attach to the same site records as your values, COPE and present-day hazard scores.
The same portfolio, the same locations. No separate spreadsheet of coordinates to assemble for the climate exercise.
Munich Re climate scenarios run to 2030, 2040, 2050 and 2100, so you can compare a moderate pathway against a high-emissions one.
Every projection sits next to the present-day score for the same site, which is what makes the change legible rather than abstract.
Compare a moderate pathway against a high-emissions one at the horizon your capital planning actually uses.
Sea level rise, subsidence, heat stress and fire weather stress — the exposures that do not show up on a present-day hazard map.
Same provider as the present-day scores, so the projection and the baseline are not two vendors disagreeing about the same site.
NatCat scores the hazard your sites face today. Climate projects how that hazard shifts under emissions scenarios out to 2100. Same portfolio, same source, different question — which is why they are separate.
Munich Re climate pathways — the RCP and SSP scenarios — at 2030, 2040, 2050 and 2100, so a moderate and a high-emissions future can be held side by side.
Tropical cyclone, river flood, sea level rise, subsidence, heat stress and fire weather stress, depending on the location and the scenario selected.
The Munich Re Climate Change Edition — the same provider behind the present-day NatCat scores, so the two views are built on one source rather than two vendors who disagree.
See your own portfolio under a Munich Re climate scenario, next to where it stands today.